Chapter 3: Problems with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive) |
fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080509145950/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/alford3.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | | url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080509145950/http://www.wbabin.net/physics/alford3.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)] | ||
| author = [[Jeff Alford]] | | author = [[Jeff Alford]] | ||
| keywords = [[Einstein | | keywords = [[Einstein's Train]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[General Science Journal]] | | journal = [[General Science Journal]] | ||
Revision as of 08:59, 22 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Chapter 3: Problems with Einstein\'s Train Thought Experiment |
| Read in full | Link to paper (Internet Archive) |
| Author(s) | Jeff Alford |
| Keywords | Einstein's Train |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 6 |
Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)
Abstract
It is examined how Einstein's Train Thought Experiment leads to fallacies, in spite of ones interpretation of this thought experiment. This paper presumes that the reader has read my other paper ?A Brief Overview of SRT? as well as ?Relativity?, by Einstein. This is especially important because the ideas proposed in this paper are of a very speculative nature, and one should know the theory before one begins to speculate with regards to the interpretations of the theory. The appendix presents a brief outline of the argument of this paper.