Jump to content

Unipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
restore accented characters lost to the encoding bug (verified names/words only; URLs untouched)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox paper
{{Infobox paper
| title = Unipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics
| title = Unipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics
| author = [[Francisco J M?ller]]
| author = [[Francisco J Müller]]
| keywords = [[unipolar induction]], [[relativistic electrodynamics]], [[motion]], [[conductor]], [[magnet]], [[General Relativity]]
| keywords = [[unipolar induction]], [[relativistic electrodynamics]], [[motion]], [[conductor]], [[magnet]], [[General Relativity]]
| published = 1990
| published = 1990

Latest revision as of 09:18, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleUnipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics
Author(s)Francisco J Müller
Keywordsunipolar induction, relativistic electrodynamics, motion, conductor, magnet, General Relativity
Published1990
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume1
Number3
Pages27-31

Abstract

The relativistic requirement of relative motion between a conductor and a magnet to produce electromagnetic induction is critically re-examined both historically and by original experiments. That no such requirement is needed for a rotating system was demonstrated by Kennard in 1917 and is acknowledged by some relativists, who have therefore resorted to General Relativity for an explanation of the rotational unipolar inductor. But the additional experimental tests with a modified, rectilinear version of the unipolar inductor reported here rule out General Relativity as well. There appears therefore to be a need for some new theoretical formulation of the problem, based either on classical (Maxwellian or Amperian) electrodynamics or on an altogether new approach.