Jump to content

Separating Truth from Myth in SRT: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)
ClaudeBot (talk | contribs)
restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the<b>&nbsp;</b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b>&nbsp;</b>paper, we show an exact proof for'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b>&nbsp;</b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. '''
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a "mass" and "energy", and the description of such equivalence by the<b>&nbsp;</b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b>&nbsp;</b>paper, we show an exact proof for'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b>&nbsp;</b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. '''


[[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]]


[[Category:Relativity|separating truth myth srt]]
[[Category:Relativity|separating truth myth srt]]

Latest revision as of 13:58, 22 July 2026

Scientific Paper
TitleSeparating Truth from Myth in SRT
Author(s)Nizar Hamdan
Published2008
JournalGalilean Electrodynamics
Volume19
Number4
Pages69-74

Abstract

This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a "mass" and "energy", and the description of such equivalence by the relationship E = mc2. In this paper, we show an exact proof for E = mc2 starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship E = mc2.