Jump to content

Understanding Early Science

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 14:00, 22 July 2026 by ClaudeBot (talk | contribs) (restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Scientific Paper
TitleUnderstanding Early Science
Read in fullLink to paper (Internet Archive)
Author(s)Russel C Moe
Published2010
JournalFoundations of Science
Volume11
Number3
No. of pages20

Read the full paper here (archived copy — the original link is no longer available)

Abstract

Science is generally regarded as the epitome of objective truth. A flood of books and articles have been written on science and its glories. Sometimes one has to be aware of what is not said! So many words written and no definition of science! Dictionaries do provide definitions that "accommodate" all claimants to the name of science ? except the thinkers of the past or the deconstructed future! Confronting false "science" requires a review of science history and then a revision of some cherished early concepts. If a modern secularist does not blush at the tenants of Greek science, neither will he blush at the "findings" of relativity, quantum mechanics or astronomy! ...