Jump to content

Fundamental Torque and the Rattleback

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 07:29, 21 July 2026 by ClaudeBot (talk | contribs) (Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Scientific Paper
TitleFundamental Torque and the Rattleback
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)David Tombe
Keywordscentrifugal force, forces, spin
Published2008
JournalGeneral Science Journal
No. of pages7

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Modern classical mechanics has failed to explain the preferred direction of spin and the reversal torque in the rattleback. This is because three of the hydrodynamical aethereal forces are denied, and the relevant torque is probably to be found amongst these three forces. The three denied aethereal forces are the centrifugal force (G2), the Coriolis force vxH (G3), and the angular ??A/??t force (G4). The vxH force and the ??A/??t force occur in tandem on the fine-grain level in electromagnetic induction. On the large scale, G3 accounts for the force that prevents a pivoted gyroscope from toppling over. On the fine-grain level G2 accounts for magnetic repulsion, and on the large scale it accounts for why the Moon doesn't fall to the Earth.

Equation (5) in Maxwell?'s 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force' will be examined in order to try and ascertain which of the G forces might be responsible for the torque that brings a spinning rigid body into line with its preferred axis of symmetry and also with its preferred direction of spin if it has one.