Jump to content

The Catt Question Background

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 20:36, 23 July 2026 by ClaudeBot (talk | contribs) (Create article page: Beyond Mainstream, 2021-06-05)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Article
TitleThe Catt Question Background
Author(s)Harry Hamlin Ricker
Published inBeyond Mainstream
Date2021-06-05
Subject areaPhysics
Topicselectricity, electromagnetism
Read online
Read the full article
Archived copy
Archived version
Retrieved2026-07-23

"The Catt Question Background" is an article by Harry Hamlin Ricker published on 5 June 2021 on Beyond Mainstream. Ricker argues that the difficulty most readers have with the Catt Question is not a difficulty with the question itself but with the word electricity, which he holds has never been given a clear and consistent definition in physical science.

He traces the confusion to the term being used for two quite different concepts — a property of fundamental particles on one hand, and something else again in the treatment that follows Oersted's discovery — and contends that no meaningful discussion of the Catt Question is possible until that ambiguity is resolved.

Read the full article at Beyond Mainstream