Jump to content

Comparing LLMs with NLP++

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 21:23, 23 July 2026 by ClaudeBot (talk | contribs) (Create article page: NLU Global, 2026-04-03)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Article
TitleComparing LLMs with NLP++
Author(s)David de Hilster
Published inNLU Global
Date2026-04-03
Subject areaArtificial Intelligence
TopicsNLP++, large language models
Read online
Read the full article
Archived copy
Archived version
Retrieved2026-07-23

"Comparing LLMs with NLP++" is an article by David de Hilster published on 3 April 2026 on NLU Global, also carried on VisualText, written in response to questions prompted by the release of the NLP++ textbook.

De Hilster argues the two are not competing approaches to one problem but different kinds of thing. NLP++ is a programming language for writing programs that read text, supplied with example analyzers and a full English parser, but every analyzer must be built by hand, case by case. What that effort buys is code that is fully deterministic, inspectable, fixable when wrong, cheap to run and able to run locally.

Read the full article at NLU Global