Difference between revisions of "A Critique of Modern Physics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | This paper is a critique of the present state of Modern Theoretical Physics. There are two allegedly separate physical anomalies which have so far defeated every attempt at explanation in terms of current standard of physics. This is to the extent that a NASA spokesman has said that in order to explain these anomalies, a whole ?new physics' might need to be contemplated.</p></span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | This paper is a critique of the present state of Modern Theoretical Physics. There are two allegedly separate physical anomalies which have so far defeated every attempt at explanation in terms of current standard of physics. This is to the extent that a NASA spokesman has said that in order to explain these anomalies, a whole ?new physics' might need to be contemplated.</p></span> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|critique modern physics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Critique of Modern Physics |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vivian Pope |
| Keywords | POAMS |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 9 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This paper is a critique of the present state of Modern Theoretical Physics. There are two allegedly separate physical anomalies which have so far defeated every attempt at explanation in terms of current standard of physics. This is to the extent that a NASA spokesman has said that in order to explain these anomalies, a whole ?new physics' might need to be contemplated.
