Difference between revisions of "A Unitary Model for Atomic Structure"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In the unitary model the atomic nucleus plays a decisive role in atomic structure and atomic interactions including chemical bonding. On the assumption that nuclear structure determines and dictates atomic structure and molecular geometry, structures for Carbon, Silicon, Boron and Chlorine atoms are proposed that explain their covalent bonding patterns. Arguments are presented against the current interpretation of ?atomic number?. | In the unitary model the atomic nucleus plays a decisive role in atomic structure and atomic interactions including chemical bonding. On the assumption that nuclear structure determines and dictates atomic structure and molecular geometry, structures for Carbon, Silicon, Boron and Chlorine atoms are proposed that explain their covalent bonding patterns. Arguments are presented against the current interpretation of ?atomic number?. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|unitary model atomic structure]] |
| − | [[Category:Structure]] | + | [[Category:Structure|unitary model atomic structure]] |
Latest revision as of 19:21, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Unitary Model for Atomic Structure |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Sithamalli K Balasubramanian |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 27 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In the unitary model the atomic nucleus plays a decisive role in atomic structure and atomic interactions including chemical bonding. On the assumption that nuclear structure determines and dictates atomic structure and molecular geometry, structures for Carbon, Silicon, Boron and Chlorine atoms are proposed that explain their covalent bonding patterns. Arguments are presented against the current interpretation of ?atomic number?.
