Difference between revisions of "Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|ajay sharma rejustifies paper generalization e mc pointing elementary mistake 's andrew george 's paper]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:55, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake\'s in Andrew George\'s Paper |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ajay Sharma |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Old and New Concepts of Physics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 553-558 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here.
