Difference between revisions of "Anschaulichkeit - ein Missverst?ndnis in der Physik?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The mathematical formalism determine the understanding of the physical connections. Everything is mathematically ascertainable and in some way to empirically verifiable statements leads, is regarded as cognition. However the quantitative verification of (mathematical) models - known essential truth criterion - as a sufficient criterion to accept the truth? Qualitative statements must be vividly? - Logical inconsistency of the applied models will be happy with the waiving of vividness apologized. Especially in quantum physics seems to deal with the existence of disjoint abzufinden models. How vivid is the classic physics?[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The mathematical formalism determine the understanding of the physical connections. Everything is mathematically ascertainable and in some way to empirically verifiable statements leads, is regarded as cognition. However the quantitative verification of (mathematical) models - known essential truth criterion - as a sufficient criterion to accept the truth? Qualitative statements must be vividly? - Logical inconsistency of the applied models will be happy with the waiving of vividness apologized. Especially in quantum physics seems to deal with the existence of disjoint abzufinden models. How vivid is the classic physics? |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|anschaulichkeit - ein missverst ndnis der physik]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:00, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Anschaulichkeit - ein Missverst?ndnis in der Physik? |
| Author(s) | Wolfgang Neundorf |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1999 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
The mathematical formalism determine the understanding of the physical connections. Everything is mathematically ascertainable and in some way to empirically verifiable statements leads, is regarded as cognition. However the quantitative verification of (mathematical) models - known essential truth criterion - as a sufficient criterion to accept the truth? Qualitative statements must be vividly? - Logical inconsistency of the applied models will be happy with the waiving of vividness apologized. Especially in quantum physics seems to deal with the existence of disjoint abzufinden models. How vivid is the classic physics?
