Anschaulichkeit - ein Missverst?ndnis in der Physik?

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 09:24, 30 December 2016 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Scientific Paper
Title Anschaulichkeit - ein Missverst?ndnis in der Physik?
Author(s) Wolfgang Neundorf
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 1999
Journal None


The mathematical formalism determine the understanding of the physical connections. Everything is mathematically ascertainable and in some way to empirically verifiable statements leads, is regarded as cognition. However the quantitative verification of (mathematical) models - known essential truth criterion - as a sufficient criterion to accept the truth? Qualitative statements must be vividly? - Logical inconsistency of the applied models will be happy with the waiving of vividness apologized. Especially in quantum physics seems to deal with the existence of disjoint abzufinden models. How vivid is the classic physics?