Difference between revisions of "Assessing Conceptual Trends in 20th Century Physics"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
In <em>British Society for the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of London meeting 6-9 Sept, 1996, pp. 345-347.</em> This essay is an attempt at a non-technical account of the interplay of concepts pertaining to the realms of relativity and quanta. An all-out global approach holds promise for a more compatible assessment of the two branches of physics. A re-evaluation of the traditionally central position presently held by the Schroedinger-Dirac process must be regarded as a natural consequence of such a change of strategy.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
In <em>British Society for the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of London meeting 6-9 Sept, 1996, pp. 345-347.</em> This essay is an attempt at a non-technical account of the interplay of concepts pertaining to the realms of relativity and quanta. An all-out global approach holds promise for a more compatible assessment of the two branches of physics. A re-evaluation of the traditionally central position presently held by the Schroedinger-Dirac process must be regarded as a natural consequence of such a change of strategy.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|assessing conceptual trends th century physics]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 10:03, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Assessing Conceptual Trends in 20th Century Physics
Author(s) Evert Jan Post
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 1997
Journal Galilean Electrodynamics
Volume 8
Number 2
Pages 37-40

Abstract

In British Society for the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of London meeting 6-9 Sept, 1996, pp. 345-347. This essay is an attempt at a non-technical account of the interplay of concepts pertaining to the realms of relativity and quanta. An all-out global approach holds promise for a more compatible assessment of the two branches of physics. A re-evaluation of the traditionally central position presently held by the Schroedinger-Dirac process must be regarded as a natural consequence of such a change of strategy.