Difference between revisions of "Atomic Cascade Experiments With Two-Channel Polarizers and Quantum Mechanical Nonlocality"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
3 - Einstein's locality: "But on one supposition, we should, in my opinion absolutely hold fast: The real factual situation of the system S<sub>2</sub> is independent of what is done with the system S<sub>1</sub> which is spatially separated from the former." | 3 - Einstein's locality: "But on one supposition, we should, in my opinion absolutely hold fast: The real factual situation of the system S<sub>2</sub> is independent of what is done with the system S<sub>1</sub> which is spatially separated from the former." | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|atomic cascade experiments two-channel polarizers quantum mechanical nonlocality]] |
| − | [[Category:Unified Theory]] | + | [[Category:Unified Theory|atomic cascade experiments two-channel polarizers quantum mechanical nonlocality]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Atomic Cascade Experiments With Two-Channel Polarizers and Quantum Mechanical Nonlocality |
| Author(s) | M Ardehali |
| Keywords | atomic cascade, two-channel polarizers, photons, quantum mechanics, nonlocality, wave function |
| Published | 1994 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 545-554 |
Abstract
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) used their famous criteria of realism and locality to conclude that the wave function does not provide a complete description of physical reality. Their argument (adapted to Bohm's gedanken experiment for a pair of photons in the singlet state) is based on the following three premises:
1 - Quantum mechanical (QM) perfect correlations: If the polarization of photons 1 and 2 are measured along the same axis, then the outcomes are perfectly (anti) correlated.
2- EPR's criterion of realism: "If without in any way disturbing a system, we can predict with certainty (i.e., with probability equal to unity) the value of a physical quantity, then there exists an element of physical reality corresponding to this physical quantity."
3 - Einstein's locality: "But on one supposition, we should, in my opinion absolutely hold fast: The real factual situation of the system S2 is independent of what is done with the system S1 which is spatially separated from the former."
