Difference between revisions of "Compton Effect Obeys Newton's Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray?s scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein?s mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray?s scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein?s mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|compton effect obeys newton 's law]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:10, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Compton Effect Obeys Newton\'s Law |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Qing Zeng |
Keywords | Compton, scattering, Newton, mass-energy relation |
Published | 2010 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 7 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In 1923, Compton used Planck quantum hypothesis and mass-energy transformation formula to explain X-ray?s scattering effect. This article uses Planck quantum hypothesis and Newton's Law and gets the same conclusion. Meanwhile, Chinese professor Wu Youxun made an experiment in 1926 and the conclusion anastomosed. Through analysis, we can see that Newton's Law is authoritative and comprehensive, but Einstein?s mass-energy transformation formula has some defects. From this point of view, this article is challenging the relativity.