Difference between revisions of "Conclusions About the Simultaneity of Two Events"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A ?gedanken' experiment is presented whereby two simultaneous events (from the point of view of an obesrver in a train) trigger an explosion which destroys a train. A stationary observer using the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) to determine simultaneity in the train concludes that no simultaneous events have occurred on the train, hence the train is intact. It is pointed out that the conclusion the stationary observer makes is incorrect because it is based on STR as a method to determine simultaneity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A ?gedanken' experiment is presented whereby two simultaneous events (from the point of view of an obesrver in a train) trigger an explosion which destroys a train. A stationary observer using the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) to determine simultaneity in the train concludes that no simultaneous events have occurred on the train, hence the train is intact. It is pointed out that the conclusion the stationary observer makes is incorrect because it is based on STR as a method to determine simultaneity. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|conclusions simultaneity events]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:10, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Conclusions About the Simultaneity of Two Events |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vesselin C Noninski |
| Keywords | Simultaneity, Special Relativity |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | PhilSci-Archive |
| No. of pages | 8 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
A ?gedanken' experiment is presented whereby two simultaneous events (from the point of view of an obesrver in a train) trigger an explosion which destroys a train. A stationary observer using the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) to determine simultaneity in the train concludes that no simultaneous events have occurred on the train, hence the train is intact. It is pointed out that the conclusion the stationary observer makes is incorrect because it is based on STR as a method to determine simultaneity.
