Difference between revisions of "Dynamic Gamma Factor: Yes; Lorentz Transformation: No"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
# Newman. D., et al. Phy. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1355 ff. | # Newman. D., et al. Phy. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1355 ff. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|dynamic gamma factor yes lorentz transformation]] |
Latest revision as of 10:17, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Dynamic Gamma Factor: Yes; Lorentz Transformation: No |
| Author(s) | Georg Galeczki |
| Keywords | Gamma Factor, Lorentz Transformation |
| Published | 1999 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
Mass increase with velocity and slowing down of some physical processes are non-reciprocal, absolute effects, dependent on Newtonian absolute velocity. This was confirmed in the Bertozzi experiment1 in which both kinetic energy and velocity were directly and independently measured. The definition of the uniform velocity excludes all non-Galilean transformations. so that the kinematic gamma-factor equals one. Mass increase with velocity is a consequence of kinetic energy possessing inertia. The inertia of potential and / or configuration energy has to be postulated. Both the theoretical and the empirical absence of "Thomas precession" requires a new analysis of the electron and muon g-factor measurement at CERN, in which the deviation (g-2) was derived from the beat frequency between the cyclotron frequency and that of the "Thomas precession".2 # Bertozzi. W., Am. J, Physics. 32 (1964) 151-155.
- Newman. D., et al. Phy. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1355 ff.
