Difference between revisions of "Einstein's Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]] | ||
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]] |
Latest revision as of 19:29, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Einstein\'s Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Roger J Anderton |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2011 |
Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
Volume | 8 |
No. of pages | 2 |
Pages | 17-18 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.