Difference between revisions of "Electromagnetic Propulsion of Matter in Violation of Newton's 3rd Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The intention of this article to hypothesize a theory of electromagnetic propulsion of matter, using a pulsed electric current, located within a wire conductor, that induces a magnetic field, which then interacts with its own current to propel that conductor [Mass or matter] without a propellant. This function is a violation of Newton's third law. So in this scenario F x ma in one direction does not equal F x ma in the opposite direction.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The intention of this article to hypothesize a theory of electromagnetic propulsion of matter, using a pulsed electric current, located within a wire conductor, that induces a magnetic field, which then interacts with its own current to propel that conductor [Mass or matter] without a propellant. This function is a violation of Newton's third law. So in this scenario F x ma in one direction does not equal F x ma in the opposite direction. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|electromagnetic propulsion matter violation newton 's rd law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Electromagnetic Propulsion of Matter in Violation of Newton\'s 3rd Law |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | John R Warfield |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 7 |
| No. of pages | 9 |
| Pages | 603-611 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The intention of this article to hypothesize a theory of electromagnetic propulsion of matter, using a pulsed electric current, located within a wire conductor, that induces a magnetic field, which then interacts with its own current to propel that conductor [Mass or matter] without a propellant. This function is a violation of Newton's third law. So in this scenario F x ma in one direction does not equal F x ma in the opposite direction.
