Difference between revisions of "Experimental Investigation of the Doppler Effect, Continued"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental investigation doppler effect continued]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:23, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Experimental Investigation of the Doppler Effect, Continued |
| Author(s) | Lev A Pobedonostsev |
| Keywords | Doppler effect, nitrogen, relativistic formula |
| Published | 1993 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 7-8 |
Abstract
The paper reports measurement of the Doppler effect in the same way as on previous occasions [1. 2], but in the present series of experiments the working space is filled with nitrogen rather than hydrogen. The previous conclusion, that the Doppler effect is correctly expressed by the classical, not by the relativistic formula, is again confirmed.
