Difference between revisions of "Moving Clock Does not Run Slow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. | + | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clock does run slow]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|moving clock does run slow]] |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Moving Clock Does not Run Slow |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Boon Leong Lan |
Keywords | special relativity, clocks, time |
Published | 2009 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.