Difference between revisions of "Moving Clocks, Reference Frames and the Twin Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clocks reference frames twin paradox]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clocks reference frames twin paradox]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|moving clocks reference frames twin paradox]] |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Moving Clocks, Reference Frames and the Twin Paradox |
| Author(s) | Curtis E Renshaw |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1996 |
| Journal | None |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 27-31 |
Abstract
IEEE AES Systems Magazine 11 (1) pp. 27-31 ('Jan 1996'). We have seen in a previous paper that it is the act of a moving clock out of one inertial frame of reference (IFR) and into another IFR which causes the clock to slow [1]. But what of identical clocks constructed and calibrated in different IFRs? This paper takes a looks at such a scenario, demonstrating that two such clocks would tick synchronously and concludes with a new look at the famous "twin-paradox" of special relativity, SRT.
