Difference between revisions of "No God Particle Renders Particle Accelerators Useless"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Many scientists chase after the ultimate particle, the ultimate theory, all in the context of modern physics tools such as particle colliders. Yet, logic shows that there can never be a theory of everything, never have the ultimate particle, and the technique of smashing particles together is loosing proposition in science. | Many scientists chase after the ultimate particle, the ultimate theory, all in the context of modern physics tools such as particle colliders. Yet, logic shows that there can never be a theory of everything, never have the ultimate particle, and the technique of smashing particles together is loosing proposition in science. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|theory god particle renders particle accelerators useless]] |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|theory god particle renders particle accelerators useless]] |
| − | [[Category:Philosophy]] | + | [[Category:Philosophy|theory god particle renders particle accelerators useless]] |
Latest revision as of 19:45, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | No God Particle Renders Particle Accelerators Useless |
| Author(s) | David de Hilster |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2013 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 1 |
Abstract
Many scientists chase after the ultimate particle, the ultimate theory, all in the context of modern physics tools such as particle colliders. Yet, logic shows that there can never be a theory of everything, never have the ultimate particle, and the technique of smashing particles together is loosing proposition in science.
