View source for O(3) Electrodynamics: A Second Reply to Hunter

{{Infobox paper
| title = O(3) Electrodynamics: A Second Reply to Hunter
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_639.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Myron W Evans]]
| keywords = [[B(3)]], [[Stokes Theorem]]
| published = 2000
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[7]]
| number = [[1-2]]
| num_pages = 4
| pages = 29-32
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_639.pdf here]

==Abstract==

In O(3) symmetry electrodynamics the field tensor is governed by a non-Abelian Stokes Theorem, as in any non-Abelian gauge theory. The comments on the B(3) component of this field tensor by Hunter in this Issue address B(3) as if it were a U(1) symmetry field, governed by the ordinary Stokes Theorem, and are therefore sequentially erroneous, because there is a basic misunderstanding of the nature of O(3) electrodynamics inherent in the article.

[[Category:Scientific Paper|o electrodynamics second reply hunter]]

[[Category:Electrodynamics|o electrodynamics second reply hunter]]