O(3) Electrodynamics: A Second Reply to Hunter
Revision as of 10:47, 1 January 2017 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | O(3) Electrodynamics: A Second Reply to Hunter |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Myron W Evans |
Keywords | B(3), Stokes Theorem |
Published | 2000 |
Journal | Apeiron |
Volume | 7 |
Number | 1-2 |
No. of pages | 4 |
Pages | 29-32 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
In O(3) symmetry electrodynamics the field tensor is governed by a non-Abelian Stokes Theorem, as in any non-Abelian gauge theory. The comments on the B(3) component of this field tensor by Hunter in this Issue address B(3) as if it were a U(1) symmetry field, governed by the ordinary Stokes Theorem, and are therefore sequentially erroneous, because there is a basic misunderstanding of the nature of O(3) electrodynamics inherent in the article.