Difference between revisions of "On a Relativistic Magnetic Top"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron. | + | The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron. |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic magnetic]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|relativistic magnetic]] |
Latest revision as of 19:46, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | On a Relativistic Magnetic Top |
Author(s) | Mirjana Bozic, Dusan Arsenovic |
Keywords | relativistic magnetic top, particle spin, point electron |
Published | 1997 |
Journal | None |
Pages | 201-207 |
Abstract
The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron.