Difference between revisions of "Re-Examination of Newton's First Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|re-examination newton 's law]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|re-examination newton 's law]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Gravity|re-examination newton 's law]] |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Re-Examination of Newton\'s First Law |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Mitch Emery |
| Keywords | Newton, Motion, Inertia, Gravitation, Equivalence Principle |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 1 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 46-47 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Trouble with Newton's First Law was found in my original study, but the trouble is not easy to see. In fact, most readers fail to see it. Old ways of thinking stand in their way, and so the purpose of this note is to reexamine Newton's First Law, and to put its trouble in perspective with the state of modern physics.
