Difference between revisions of "Relativity Failures 2006: The Case of NV CMa Binary Stars"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
This ia another Binary star system in contradicitons with relativity theory proving that not only relativity theory is wrong but relativity theory is stupidity itself because time is not a structure to allow space - to time - back to space jumping regardless what fortune hunters Nobel prize winners have/had to say about.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
This ia another Binary star system in contradicitons with relativity theory proving that not only relativity theory is wrong but relativity theory is stupidity itself because time is not a structure to allow space - to time - back to space jumping regardless what fortune hunters Nobel prize winners have/had to say about.
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity failures case nv cma binary stars]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Relativity|relativity failures case nv cma binary stars]]

Latest revision as of 19:53, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Relativity Failures 2006: The Case of NV CMa Binary Stars
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Joe Alexander Nahhas
Keywords Binary, stars, relativity, apsidal, motion, NV. Canis, Majoris, Mercury, Venus, precession.perihelion, period, formula
Published 2006
Journal None
No. of pages 8

Read the full paper here

Abstract

This ia another Binary star system in contradicitons with relativity theory proving that not only relativity theory is wrong but relativity theory is stupidity itself because time is not a structure to allow space - to time - back to space jumping regardless what fortune hunters Nobel prize winners have/had to say about.