Difference between revisions of "Science of Origins, Part 2 ? Empirical Evidence"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Part 1 of Science of Origins [1] discussed some principles of origins and presented five doctrines of creation: God is eternal, God is omnipotent, God is creator, God is sustainer, and God is omniscient. Part 2 compares the first four of these doctrines of creation-science with the doctrines of naturalism that deny any supernatural activity occurred in establishing and forming the universe. In this paper, the claims of the supernatural and natural doctrines of origins of the universe are tested by the empirical evidence. Empirical data and laws of physics favor the supernatural origin of the universe.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
Part 1 of Science of Origins [1] discussed some principles of origins and presented five doctrines of creation: God is eternal, God is omnipotent, God is creator, God is sustainer, and God is omniscient. Part 2 compares the first four of these doctrines of creation-science with the doctrines of naturalism that deny any supernatural activity occurred in establishing and forming the universe. In this paper, the claims of the supernatural and natural doctrines of origins of the universe are tested by the empirical evidence. Empirical data and laws of physics favor the supernatural origin of the universe.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|science origins empirical evidence]]

Latest revision as of 11:03, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Science of Origins, Part 2 ? Empirical Evidence
Author(s) David L Bergman
Keywords God, Creator, Omni
Published 2007
Journal Foundations of Science
Volume 10
Number 3
No. of pages 21

Abstract

Part 1 of Science of Origins [1] discussed some principles of origins and presented five doctrines of creation: God is eternal, God is omnipotent, God is creator, God is sustainer, and God is omniscient. Part 2 compares the first four of these doctrines of creation-science with the doctrines of naturalism that deny any supernatural activity occurred in establishing and forming the universe. In this paper, the claims of the supernatural and natural doctrines of origins of the universe are tested by the empirical evidence. Empirical data and laws of physics favor the supernatural origin of the universe.