Difference between revisions of "Separating Truth from Myth in SRT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the<b> </b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b> </b>paper, we show an exact proof for''' '''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b> </b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship''' '''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. ''' | This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the<b> </b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b> </b>paper, we show an exact proof for''' '''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b> </b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship''' '''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. ''' | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Separating Truth from Myth in SRT |
| Author(s) | Nizar Hamdan |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 69-74 |
Abstract
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the relationship E = mc2. In this paper, we show an exact proof for E = mc2 starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship E = mc2.
