Difference between revisions of "Separating Truth from Myth in SRT"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the<b>&nbsp;</b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b>&nbsp;</b>paper, we show an exact proof for'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b>&nbsp;</b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. '''
 
This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the<b>&nbsp;</b>relationship E = mc<sup>2</sup><b>. </b>In this<b>&nbsp;</b>paper, we show an exact proof for'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup> starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is<b>&nbsp;</b>important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship'''&nbsp;'''E = mc<sup>2</sup>'''. '''
  
[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|separating truth myth srt]]
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Relativity|separating truth myth srt]]

Latest revision as of 19:55, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Separating Truth from Myth in SRT
Author(s) Nizar Hamdan
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 2008
Journal Galilean Electrodynamics
Volume 19
Number 4
Pages 69-74

Abstract

This paper identifies the fundamental conceptual flaw that has persisted for the past 100 years. The flaw is the equivalence of a ?mass? and ?energy?, and the description of such equivalence by the relationship E = mc2. In this paper, we show an exact proof for E = mc2 starting from classical Mechanics. This is done from the point of view of one inertial frame, not two, and without invoking the theory of electromagnetism [1], as well as without invoking SRT [2]. The existence of an invariant 3d- force is important to get the relativistic mechanics from the relationship E = mc2.