Difference between revisions of "Stellar Aberration and the Postulates on the Velocity of Light"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This paper presents a simple proof of the validity of the universal time postulate on the velocity of light based on the experimental data on stellar aberration observed by Bradley in 1728. It is demonstrated that Einstein's postulate on the velocity of light predicts stellar aberration correctly in coordinate systems in which the star is stationary but fails to predict the phenomenon at all in the earthbound coordinate system in which it is observed. | This paper presents a simple proof of the validity of the universal time postulate on the velocity of light based on the experimental data on stellar aberration observed by Bradley in 1728. It is demonstrated that Einstein's postulate on the velocity of light predicts stellar aberration correctly in coordinate systems in which the star is stationary but fails to predict the phenomenon at all in the earthbound coordinate system in which it is observed. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|stellar aberration postulates velocity light]] |
Latest revision as of 11:06, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Stellar Aberration and the Postulates on the Velocity of Light |
Author(s) | Domina Eberle Spencer, Uma Y Shama |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 1996 |
Journal | Physics Essays |
Volume | 9 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 476-483 |
Abstract
This paper presents a simple proof of the validity of the universal time postulate on the velocity of light based on the experimental data on stellar aberration observed by Bradley in 1728. It is demonstrated that Einstein's postulate on the velocity of light predicts stellar aberration correctly in coordinate systems in which the star is stationary but fails to predict the phenomenon at all in the earthbound coordinate system in which it is observed.