Difference between revisions of "The Case of the Lifter: Efficiencies, Power Needs, Limitations, Prospects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Lifter designers are having a lot of fun building bigger and fancier airframes. Richard Hull recommends some intentional steps to turn this technology into a useful tool for transport.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Lifter designers are having a lot of fun building bigger and fancier airframes. Richard Hull recommends some intentional steps to turn this technology into a useful tool for transport. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|case lifter efficiencies power needs limitations prospects]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:10, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Case of the Lifter: Efficiencies, Power Needs, Limitations, Prospects |
| Author(s) | Richard L Hull |
| Keywords | do-it-yourself, lifters, performance ratings |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 39 |
| Pages | 21-24 |
Abstract
Lifter designers are having a lot of fun building bigger and fancier airframes. Richard Hull recommends some intentional steps to turn this technology into a useful tool for transport.
