Difference between revisions of "The Concept of Simultaneity in SRT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The results of special relativity theory (SRT) lead to some controversial conclusions, including the interdependence of the fundamental entities space and time, the essential role of observers in different inertial reference frames in relative motion, and the relativity of simultaneity. An attempt is here made to read between the lines of various propositions suggested by Einstein, and show that the controversial conclusions trace to incomplete or incorrect interpretation of the results of SRT, and that SRT does in fact stand the tests of the day. | The results of special relativity theory (SRT) lead to some controversial conclusions, including the interdependence of the fundamental entities space and time, the essential role of observers in different inertial reference frames in relative motion, and the relativity of simultaneity. An attempt is here made to read between the lines of various propositions suggested by Einstein, and show that the controversial conclusions trace to incomplete or incorrect interpretation of the results of SRT, and that SRT does in fact stand the tests of the day. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|concept simultaneity srt]] |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|concept simultaneity srt]] |
Latest revision as of 19:59, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | The Concept of Simultaneity in SRT |
Author(s) | B L Rawat |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2004 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 15 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 3-7 |
Abstract
The results of special relativity theory (SRT) lead to some controversial conclusions, including the interdependence of the fundamental entities space and time, the essential role of observers in different inertial reference frames in relative motion, and the relativity of simultaneity. An attempt is here made to read between the lines of various propositions suggested by Einstein, and show that the controversial conclusions trace to incomplete or incorrect interpretation of the results of SRT, and that SRT does in fact stand the tests of the day.