Difference between revisions of "The Sagnac Effect, Once More"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
A simple and rigorous proof of the Sagnac effect for the most general value of the synchronization parameter  e1 is given. If in the final result one adopts the relativistic ''e<sub>1</sub>'' one can see that the relativistic theory is incompatible with the experimental evidence. Only the theory with ''e<sub>1</sub> = 0'' predicts correctly the Sagnac effect. Of course the obtained results depend on the assumptions made, which look rather safe however.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
A simple and rigorous proof of the Sagnac effect for the most general value of the synchronization parameter  e1 is given. If in the final result one adopts the relativistic ''e<sub>1</sub>'' one can see that the relativistic theory is incompatible with the experimental evidence. Only the theory with ''e<sub>1</sub> = 0'' predicts correctly the Sagnac effect. Of course the obtained results depend on the assumptions made, which look rather safe however.
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|sagnac effect]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Relativity|sagnac effect]]

Latest revision as of 20:07, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title The Sagnac Effect, Once More
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Franco Selleri
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 2012
Journal Proceedings of the NPA
Volume 9
No. of pages 3
Pages 525-527

Read the full paper here

Abstract

A simple and rigorous proof of the Sagnac effect for the most general value of the synchronization parameter e1 is given. If in the final result one adopts the relativistic e1 one can see that the relativistic theory is incompatible with the experimental evidence. Only the theory with e1 = 0 predicts correctly the Sagnac effect. Of course the obtained results depend on the assumptions made, which look rather safe however.