Difference between revisions of "Three Arguments on the Nature of Space"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
| title = Three Arguments on the Nature of Space
 
| title = Three Arguments on the Nature of Space
 
| author = [[John B Kizer]]
 
| author = [[John B Kizer]]
| published = 1977
+
| keywords = [[nature]], [[space]], [[geometry]], [[general relativity]], [[Maxwell's equations]], [[Lesagian particles]], [[waves]]
 +
| published = 1983
 
| journal = [[None]]
 
| journal = [[None]]
 
| pages = 39-43
 
| pages = 39-43
Line 9: Line 10:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
1977, 1st Place[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.
 +
 
 +
The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).
 +
 
 +
A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments nature space]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Gravity]]

Revision as of 11:31, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Three Arguments on the Nature of Space
Author(s) John B Kizer
Keywords nature, space, geometry, general relativity, Maxwell's equations, Lesagian particles, waves
Published 1983
Journal None
Pages 39-43

Abstract

The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.

The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).

A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.