Difference between revisions of "Time as the Generator of Life"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | "Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and ?somethingness? and are not adequate for what they should signify. "[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | "Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and ?somethingness? and are not adequate for what they should signify. " |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time generator life]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 11:32, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Time as the Generator of Life |
| Author(s) | Velimir Abramovic |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
"Ontology of Time is a new stage of Human Knowledge where Time is finally understood. Time is exactly what was in long history of Metaphysics mistakenly named Non-Being, or in eastern Religions and Philosophies ? Nothingness, Emptiness. However, from non-spatiality and non-corporeality (the key properties of Non-Being) isn't necessarily following the ?non-existence'. The Emptiness and Nothingness are relative notions dependent on fullness and ?somethingness? and are not adequate for what they should signify. "
