Difference between revisions of "Time for Another Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time paradox]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 11:32, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Time for Another Paradox |
Author(s) | Stephane Baune |
Keywords | superluminal, simultaneity, paradox, tachyons, localization |
Published | 2009 |
Journal | Physics Essays |
Volume | 22 |
No. of pages | 2 |
Pages | 515 |
Abstract
We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity.