Difference between revisions of "Time for Another Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity. | + | We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity. |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time paradox]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|time paradox]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Time for Another Paradox |
| Author(s) | Stephane Baune |
| Keywords | superluminal, simultaneity, paradox, tachyons, localization |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 22 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 515 |
Abstract
We consider the detection of a superluminal signal. We show that there exists a particular inertial frame in which the superluminal signal is not uniquely localizable and that it is detected everywhere at the same instant within the inertial frame. This leads to a novel paradox to which we attribute the relativity of simultaneity.
