Difference between revisions of "Topology and the Fractional Hall Effect"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Most people are inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, because there always are malcontents claiming, or imagining, they have been wronged by steam roller tactics of the high and mighty. If it is a clear judicial situation, the standard argument is let them bring suit if they are serious about what they say. | Most people are inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, because there always are malcontents claiming, or imagining, they have been wronged by steam roller tactics of the high and mighty. If it is a clear judicial situation, the standard argument is let them bring suit if they are serious about what they say. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|topology fractional hall effect]] |
Latest revision as of 11:32, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Topology and the Fractional Hall Effect |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Evert Jan Post |
| Keywords | Fractional Hall Effect, Topology |
| Published | 2000 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Is Public Relation in Physics Prevailing over Academic Evaluation? Many of those working in physics have had some thoughts about the question posed in the title. Yet it is hard to be specific as to what extent it is true and how much of it is part of a scheme to dominate. Large organizations have an edge in the PR game, yet how often do they use this advantage unfairly?
Most people are inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, because there always are malcontents claiming, or imagining, they have been wronged by steam roller tactics of the high and mighty. If it is a clear judicial situation, the standard argument is let them bring suit if they are serious about what they say.
