Conception of Physical Meaning: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| author = [[Robert A Kerr]] | | author = [[Robert A Kerr]] | ||
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| num_pages = 4 | | num_pages = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 18 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Conception of Physical Meaning |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert A Kerr |
| Published | 2008 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The most significant problem with physical science is the substitution of empirical methods for conceivable reality. Without conception science is blind and it is impossible to surmount the obstacles encountered in its pursuit. Many of the fundamentals are reduced to equations which arrive at the correct answers and dispel the requirements to visualize why the answers are valid. Ignoring basic precepts allows unlimited speculation. Conception is the criterion for reality. It is mandatory that how and why things happen must form the foundation of science.