Light, Gravity and Einstein's Twin Paradox: Difference between revisions
Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup) |
Add to Category:Light |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = Light, Gravity and Einstein | | title = Light, Gravity and Einstein's Twin Paradox | ||
| author = [[Paul E Rowe]] | | author = [[Paul E Rowe]] | ||
| keywords = [[Light]], [[Gravity]], [[Twin Paradox]] | | keywords = [[Light]], [[Gravity]], [[Twin Paradox]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Gravity|light gravity einstein 's twin paradox]] | [[Category:Gravity|light gravity einstein 's twin paradox]] | ||
[[Category:Light]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Light, Gravity and Einstein's Twin Paradox |
| Author(s) | Paul E Rowe |
| Keywords | Light, Gravity, Twin Paradox |
| Published | 2000 |
Abstract
Maxwell's equations accurately predict the speed of light in various media and the reflectance and refraction of light at media interfaces. In order to make these equations work, Maxwell gave space a definite permittivity and a definite magnetic permeability. A void cannot have such properties. A matrix of unpaired electrons and positive particles would have such properties. As predicted by Einstein, light passing near the sun or other large mass is bent towards the mass. According to Maxwell's equations, this indicates that space in the neighborhood of large masses has a higher permittivity (dielectric constant) than space far from such masses. This paper assumes that vacuum is a matrix of positive and negative charges. It discusses ramifications of this assumption, suggests a connection between light and gravity and gives a rational. solution to Einstein'S twin paradox.