Ampère vs. Grassmann on Experimental Grounds: Difference between revisions
m ClaudeBot moved page Amp?re vs. Grassmann on Experimental Grounds to Ampère vs. Grassmann on Experimental Grounds: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only) |
infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox paper | {{Infobox paper | ||
| title = | | title = Ampère vs. Grassmann on Experimental Grounds | ||
| author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]], [[Ricardo A Achilles]] | | author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]], [[Ricardo A Achilles]] | ||
| keywords = classical electrodynamics, magnetic field | |||
| published = 2010 | | published = 2010 | ||
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | | journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]] | ||
| volume = | | volume = 21 | ||
| number = | | number = 1 | ||
| pages = 18-21 | | pages = 18-21 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 21 July 2026
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ampère vs. Grassmann on Experimental Grounds |
| Author(s) | Jorge A Guala-Valverde, Ricardo A Achilles |
| Keywords | classical electrodynamics, magnetic field |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 18-21 |
Abstract
The growing interest in a thorough revision of the tenets of classical electrodynamics compels the physics community to reconsider the dominating magnetic field rationale applied to electrodynamics since the time of Lorentz. The torque-production mechanism presently attributed to homopolar machines, which is based on Grassmann's force, has been definitively ruled out by recent crucial experimentation. Conversely, Ampere's force law, restating the Newtonian symmetry requirement for energy conversion, fully explains homopolar torque production.