Difference between revisions of "Black Holes - Fact or Fiction?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|black holes - fact fiction]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|black holes - fact fiction]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Gravity|black holes - fact fiction]] |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|black holes - fact fiction]] |
Latest revision as of 19:22, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Black Holes - Fact or Fiction? |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | John O Campbell |
| Keywords | Mass, Gravity Field, Schwarzschild's Criterion, Black hole, Schwarzschild |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3-4 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 151-156 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
By using mundane static concepts of ?mass? and ?gravity field? energies, it is shown that: (1) Schwarzschild's criterion for black hole formation translates into a critical ratio of mass energy to gravity field energy ~rn/gF < 4; (2) Five objections to black holes are: (a) The scape velocity equation does not apply to light, (b) Curved space-time is a geometrical-physical delusion, (c) Curved space-time is incompatible with both the Lorentz transforms and pure mathematics, (d) The Doppler effect proves light is not affected by the space-time continuum, and (e) Kirchhoffs law for black body radiation is violated; (3) The Planck particle and our Universe are incompatible concepts.
