Difference between revisions of "Conception of Physical Meaning"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = Conception of Physical Meaning | | title = Conception of Physical Meaning | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_463.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_463.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| − | | author = [[Robert A | + | | author = [[Robert A Kerr]] |
| published = 2008 | | published = 2008 | ||
| journal = [[None]] | | journal = [[None]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The most significant problem with physical science is the substitution of empirical methods for conceivable reality. Without conception science is blind and it is impossible to surmount the obstacles encountered in its pursuit. Many of the fundamentals are reduced to equations which arrive at the correct answers and dispel the requirements to visualize why the answers are valid. Ignoring basic precepts allows unlimited speculation. Conception is the criterion for reality. It is mandatory that how and why things happen must form the foundation of science.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The most significant problem with physical science is the substitution of empirical methods for conceivable reality. Without conception science is blind and it is impossible to surmount the obstacles encountered in its pursuit. Many of the fundamentals are reduced to equations which arrive at the correct answers and dispel the requirements to visualize why the answers are valid. Ignoring basic precepts allows unlimited speculation. Conception is the criterion for reality. It is mandatory that how and why things happen must form the foundation of science. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|conception physical meaning]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:10, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Conception of Physical Meaning |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert A Kerr |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The most significant problem with physical science is the substitution of empirical methods for conceivable reality. Without conception science is blind and it is impossible to surmount the obstacles encountered in its pursuit. Many of the fundamentals are reduced to equations which arrive at the correct answers and dispel the requirements to visualize why the answers are valid. Ignoring basic precepts allows unlimited speculation. Conception is the criterion for reality. It is mandatory that how and why things happen must form the foundation of science.
