Difference between revisions of "On the Forces and Knowledge of the World"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = On the Forces and Knowledge of the World | | title = On the Forces and Knowledge of the World | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6616.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6616.pdf Link to paper] | ||
− | | author = [[Joseph J | + | | author = [[Joseph J Smulsky]] |
| published = 2012 | | published = 2012 | ||
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | | journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The paper continued clarifications on the validity of Newton's laws of gravity. Opponents of the law and of Newtonian mechanics led a number of arguments in their favor. Based on the solution of a number of problems by the program Galactica it is show that these arguments are untenable.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The paper continued clarifications on the validity of Newton's laws of gravity. Opponents of the law and of Newtonian mechanics led a number of arguments in their favor. Based on the solution of a number of problems by the program Galactica it is show that these arguments are untenable. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|forces knowledge world]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] |
Revision as of 10:49, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | On the Forces and Knowledge of the World |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Joseph J Smulsky |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2012 |
Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
Volume | 9 |
No. of pages | 3 |
Pages | 569-571 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The paper continued clarifications on the validity of Newton's laws of gravity. Opponents of the law and of Newtonian mechanics led a number of arguments in their favor. Based on the solution of a number of problems by the program Galactica it is show that these arguments are untenable.