Difference between revisions of "Comments On Cahill's Quantum Foam Inflow Theory of Gravity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | We reveal an underlying flaw in Reginald T. Cahill?s recently promoted quantum foam inflow theory of gravity. It appears to arise from a confusion of the idea of the Galilean invariance of the acceleration of an individual flow with what is obtained as an acceleration when a homogeneous flow is superposed with an inhomogeneous flow. We also point out that the General Relativistic covering theory he creates by substituting a generalized Painlev?e-Gullstrand metric into Einstein?s field equations leads to absurd results.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | We reveal an underlying flaw in Reginald T. Cahill?s recently promoted quantum foam inflow theory of gravity. It appears to arise from a confusion of the idea of the Galilean invariance of the acceleration of an individual flow with what is obtained as an acceleration when a homogeneous flow is superposed with an inhomogeneous flow. We also point out that the General Relativistic covering theory he creates by substituting a generalized Painlev?e-Gullstrand metric into Einstein?s field equations leads to absurd results. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|comments cahill 's quantum foam inflow theory gravity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:09, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Comments On Cahill\'s Quantum Foam Inflow Theory of Gravity |
Author(s) | Thomas D Martin |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2004 |
Journal | ArXiv |
No. of pages | 4 |
Abstract
We reveal an underlying flaw in Reginald T. Cahill?s recently promoted quantum foam inflow theory of gravity. It appears to arise from a confusion of the idea of the Galilean invariance of the acceleration of an individual flow with what is obtained as an acceleration when a homogeneous flow is superposed with an inhomogeneous flow. We also point out that the General Relativistic covering theory he creates by substituting a generalized Painlev?e-Gullstrand metric into Einstein?s field equations leads to absurd results.