Wiki rules

These are the reasons why the Natural Philosophy Wikipedia exists and the rules that govern it.

Why We Are Closed to Public Editing

Open wikis by nature are consensus-based which is not conducive for the advancement of science
Open wikis lead to marginalizing criticism of mainstream science
Open wikis lead to marginalizing and "pseudofying" scientific alternatives
Open wiki gatekeepers are arrogant and for the most part "Intellectuals" and not "critical thinkers"

All criticisms that have scientific merit will be allowed and described in a neutral manner
Scientific knowledge will not be judged by an author's credentials
Scientific knowledge will not be judged by count of references to that knowledge, work, or person
Politics, conspiracy theories, UFOs, and religious knowledge is not allowed
Scientific assumptions are to be included any and everywhere possible including the attempt to state "inferred" assumptions