Difference between revisions of "Limitations on Viewing Distant Astronomical Objects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | It is commonly believed that in viewing very distant astronomical objects we are seeing back in time nearly to the origin of the universe. However, some distant galaxies seem to be more evolved, i.e. older, than would be expected. This paper argues that, if we accept the expanding universe theory, we cannot see so far back in time and therefore distant objects are not seen in their infancies.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | It is commonly believed that in viewing very distant astronomical objects we are seeing back in time nearly to the origin of the universe. However, some distant galaxies seem to be more evolved, i.e. older, than would be expected. This paper argues that, if we accept the expanding universe theory, we cannot see so far back in time and therefore distant objects are not seen in their infancies. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|limitations viewing distant astronomical objects]] | ||
[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]] | [[Category:Expansion Tectonics]] |
Revision as of 10:38, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Limitations on Viewing Distant Astronomical Objects |
Author(s) | Frank Twiss |
Keywords | astronomical objects, distant galaxies, expanding universe |
Published | 1991 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 2 |
Number | 5 |
Pages | 98-102 |
Abstract
It is commonly believed that in viewing very distant astronomical objects we are seeing back in time nearly to the origin of the universe. However, some distant galaxies seem to be more evolved, i.e. older, than would be expected. This paper argues that, if we accept the expanding universe theory, we cannot see so far back in time and therefore distant objects are not seen in their infancies.