Difference between revisions of "Newton's Second Law is a Relativistic Law without Einstein's Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The claim that Newton's second law is close to the relativistic law is not quite accurate; it is more accurate to say, that Newton's second law is applied without the concept of ?mass change'. Does this mean that applying the concept ?mass change' along with Newton's second law allows all the relations in relativistic mechanics to be re-derived without using Einstein's relativity (SRT)? The present paper answers in the affirmative. | The claim that Newton's second law is close to the relativistic law is not quite accurate; it is more accurate to say, that Newton's second law is applied without the concept of ?mass change'. Does this mean that applying the concept ?mass change' along with Newton's second law allows all the relations in relativistic mechanics to be re-derived without using Einstein's relativity (SRT)? The present paper answers in the affirmative. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|newton 's second law relativistic law einstein 's relativity]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Newton\'s Second Law is a Relativistic Law without Einstein\'s Relativity |
| Author(s) | Nizar Hamdan |
| Keywords | classical mechanics, relativistic mechanics, Newton?s second law |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 71-74 |
Abstract
The claim that Newton's second law is close to the relativistic law is not quite accurate; it is more accurate to say, that Newton's second law is applied without the concept of ?mass change'. Does this mean that applying the concept ?mass change' along with Newton's second law allows all the relations in relativistic mechanics to be re-derived without using Einstein's relativity (SRT)? The present paper answers in the affirmative.
